Total 28.048.089 photos | DE: 807.584

last | HOM OZ 64 | HN WU 310 | DON Z 1880 | HOT SR 1 H | HN JH 182 | M 4856 M | HN DN 2130 | HL 130 A | HN AL 2801 | HL 130 A

Comments (5)

Juterman 2018-03-22 21:17:32 | #1

Unfortunately, prefixes TT and ÜB were rejected in the third time for reintroduction as optional.  :(

0

Rhineland-Palatinate 2018-03-22 21:20:34 | #2

Juterman (2018-03-22 21:17:32)

Juterman
Unfortunately, prefixes TT and ÜB were rejected in the third time for reintroduction as optional.

However, they will probably try again  :)

+1

Juterman 2018-03-22 21:23:18 | #3

Rhineland-Palatinate (2018-03-22 21:20:34)

Rhineland-Palatinate
Juterman
Unfortunately, prefixes TT and ÜB were rejected in the third time for reintroduction as optional.
However, they will probably try again

I hope they will do it again and... win!
P.S. I still wait for the same positive decision from the Teltow-Fläming district to reintroduce JB, LUK and ZS.

0

Helvetics 2018-03-23 15:22:16 | #4

Rhineland-Palatinate (2018-03-22 21:20:34)

Rhineland-Palatinate
Juterman
Unfortunately, prefixes TT and ÜB were rejected in the third time for reintroduction as optional.
However, they will probably try again



I don't really understand the reasons of this rejection... Is that only a matter of "solidarity"?

0

Juterman 2018-03-23 20:00:56 | #5

Helvetics (2018-03-23 15:22:16)

Helvetics
I don't really understand the reasons of this rejection... Is that only a matter of "solidarity"?

I think yes. German municipal officials who oppose this idea, just imagine dissent in LP liberalization.

0

Post a comment:

To write comments, authorization is required

Popular